As we saw in the previous blog article, using soundbites in witnessing has a downside.
That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t use them.
However, it does mean that it’s important to establish some safeguards. Continue reading
As we saw in the previous blog article, using soundbites in witnessing has a downside.
That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t use them.
However, it does mean that it’s important to establish some safeguards. Continue reading
As we saw in the first two blog articles in this series, using soundbites in witnessing can be a very effective communication tool.
Unfortunately, it also has a downside. Continue reading
In the context of religious dialogue, soundbite witnessing means sharing or defending one’s faith through the use of short, memorable statements, questions, or quotations.
Let’s look at some of the positives of soundbite witnessing. Continue reading
What type of rhetoric do you find more persuasive—long, carefully crafted arguments or concise, easy-to-remember soundbites?
By “soundbites,” I mean brief, catchy comments or sayings that convey the essence of your message and stick in the minds of your audience. Continue reading
When I was studying with Jehovah’s Witnesses, the study conductors presented me with a barrage of proof texts for which I had no answer or explanation.
Masters of Deception was written to provide those answers. The author, F.W. Thomas, states, “Our primary reason in putting out this volume is to answer the false charges which the JW deceivers hurl against the Christian Church” and to “enable Christians to withstand and blunt the ferocity of the Watchtower onslaught, which has swept so many into perdition.” (pp. xiii-xiv) Continue reading
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑